Search results

The Turbo is far of, but the 4S has a smaller rear motor so it could be more efficient …

Did a comparison drive home to home loop on the highway so most driving on highway. IX 50 on 22 inch vs Turbo on 20 inch, no heating except for seat and steering wheel, cold start both of them, both had 38% at the start of the test … The Porsche was lowered and the BMW was on efficiency mode...

I just linked Tronity, though it stated it was Porsche Macan compatible, and the link seems successful … no data in dashboard

RWS is a must have option in my opinion, the price is “negligible“ especially compared to the Burmester 😂. The Turbo is very fast and I think that ones you take the options on the 4S the difference in price becomes less, however the one reason I would go for the 4S now is range, I really think...

Everything removed, want to keep the surprise 😉

Does it work? I’m interested in this as I use BimmerFlow now eflow … Should have read the complete thread, no for the moment 😕

Yes, I should have waited for that one 🤷‍♂️ Didn’t you mean -13% range?

efficiency and battery size add up (mine has 105kwh usable), I was hoping that the numbers Porsche quoted where realistic … but they are not. Or put it in another way, I can easily attain WLTP range from April to september in the iX with normal driving, that is 5km/h over de speed limit … So...

I concur, I have both and the iX is the better overall car For daily driving, if you want to have fun in the mountains it’s the Macan … The iX has a round steering wheel now. Mine is completely blacked out also the grill and on 22 inch wheels … it’s beautiful … anything else and it turns ugly...

Correct, wrong translation in my head

I would be over the moon with mixed driving at 20kwh/100km …

from what to what battery percentage was that? Indeed quite high with a normal average speed …

No it’s a 50 and it was yo-yo as I needed to overtake slow traffic so going from 80 to around 150 … resulting in 131 average over 303 km in one stretch … ideal conditions but also hills …

Depends the iX is quite ok at average above 130km/h … 85% to 12% … over 300km … Also, way more statistics in the App!

I have the 20’s and from a moise and comfort level they are at my personal limit … 21’s would be the max size I would consider on this car. But again, this is very personal …

Title says it all, when using the car’s radio, when you receive a message, the radio keeps playing while the message is read out, so 2 audio streams and of course you cannot understand anything … iOS18.1 iPhone 16 Pro …

It’s not the cost, it’s the real range to do roadtrips … during the week I need to charge ones at my wallbox, so not really an issue, but I planned to drive this 1000km in a day and stopping every 2 hours is a bit to much … I would be happy if I could attain the range of other Turbo owners on...

That is quite low indeed … and I see a similar trend on mine … not impressed with the range, I see indeed around 240miles at like 10C ?!

I can say I’m happy with the wiper, lots of mist, fine drizzle and glad I have it … I think it depends on where you live, in California, I would skip it ;-)

What is your guess o meter predicting? I’m averaging at 37kwh per 100 miles so pretty disappointed, normal driving on 20 inch and Turbo … Granted a bit colder but nto extreem 12C … and many drives I did not use heating to see if it would lower my consumption