Daniel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2021
- Threads
- 1
- Messages
- 64
- Reaction score
- 67
- Location
- Europe
- Vehicles
- Sold:Taycan 4, Now Macan 4
- Thread starter
- #1
My Taycan, during a downhill journey, could display negative consumption.
This is not the case with the Macan, moreover the reading of the "since start" trip data is wrong for downhill journeys.
I observed it several times during a round trip from home to a ski resort.
On the other hand, "since charging" data is good, as is the PRM GPS's forecast SoC calculation on arrival.
I don't know if this has an effect on the "total trip", which would be very low in any case.
For information, the "total trip" value was often very fanciful with the J1 Taycan.
Outward journey :800 m asl SoC 80 % arrival 63 % 40 km 1500 m asl , under 0° C , 39.1 kwh/100 km
Return : 1500 m asl Soc 63 % arrival 63 % 40 km 800 m asl , 6 ° C , 6.2 kw:100 km
Average calculation 39.1+6.2 / 2 = 22.65 or 39.1 /2 = 19.55 considering the final SoC
Since charging : 19.9 PCM
This is not the case with the Macan, moreover the reading of the "since start" trip data is wrong for downhill journeys.
I observed it several times during a round trip from home to a ski resort.
On the other hand, "since charging" data is good, as is the PRM GPS's forecast SoC calculation on arrival.
I don't know if this has an effect on the "total trip", which would be very low in any case.
For information, the "total trip" value was often very fanciful with the J1 Taycan.
Outward journey :800 m asl SoC 80 % arrival 63 % 40 km 1500 m asl , under 0° C , 39.1 kwh/100 km
Return : 1500 m asl Soc 63 % arrival 63 % 40 km 800 m asl , 6 ° C , 6.2 kw:100 km
Average calculation 39.1+6.2 / 2 = 22.65 or 39.1 /2 = 19.55 considering the final SoC
Since charging : 19.9 PCM
