Real consumption / range / efficiency thread … post your Macan EV performance 📊

[Yves]

Hi,

would like to have a feel of consumption and range based on different configs. So it would be nice to have a thread where owners can post their findings …
Ideally they mention the config, like 4, 4s, Turbo, wheel size, temperature, wind conditions, average speed etc …

Car (Rear/4/4S/Turbo):
Tyre Size:
Temperature (F/C):
Wind Conditions No/Headwind/Tailwind:
Altitude change 0/+m/-m:
Road conditions Wet/Dry:
City/Highway:
Average Speed (km/h Miles/h):
Average consumption (kWh/100km kWh/mile):
Predicted Range at 100%:
Real Range at 100%:

 

[salena0774]

Hi. I just received my car Thursday evening and I’m traveling through Sunday evening so I am dying to play with it and send stats.

 

[PanameraFrank]

One of the most useful things we can get is a chunk of mileage at highway speeds with miles driven, battery % used, and kwh/100 mi along with temperature & wheel size. Even better if we can get a photo of the trip computer. Other things can influence range but those samples help provide a really solid baseline.

Startup and city driving are less relevant as they can vastly differ.

 

[Daniel]

Hi,

would like to have a feel of consumption and range based on different configs. So it would be nice to have a thread where owners can post their findings …
Ideally they mention the config, like 4, 4s, Turbo, wheel size, temperature, wind conditions, average speed etc …

Car (Rear/4/4S/Turbo):
Tyre Size:
Temperature (F/C):
Wind Conditions No/Headwind/Tailwind:
Road conditions Wet/Dry:
City/Highway:
Average Speed (km/h Miles/h):
Average consumption (kWh/100km kWh/mile):
Predicted Range at 100%:
Real Range at 100%:

Living in the Alps, not in Belgium ... a very important factor is to have the same altitude, at the start and at the finish, for the route concerned for a consumption measurement

The reduction in consumption with my Taycan is significant, by optimizing the use of "cruise" mode, without obviously forgetting recovery when braking (1% more battery for 300 m of negative elevation gain , approximatively)

 

[Yves]

Living in the Alps, not in Belgium ... a very important factor is to have the same altitude, at the start and at the finish, for the route concerned for a consumption measurement

The reduction in consumption with my Taycan is significant, by optimizing the use of "cruise" mode, without obviously forgetting recovery when braking (1% more battery for 300 m of negative elevation gain , approximatively)

Good catch, thought I had them all, added altitude change
Though we do have mountain in Belgium

 

[Diego]

Here first data based on my first 264 km done (two days)
Note: some "brutal" acceleration and some time spent playing with the infotainment with car on (so driving time and average speed are not correct).

Car (Rear/4/4S/Turbo): Macan4
Tyre Size: 21" rims with Michelin
Temperature (F/C): from 12 to 20°C - light rain
Wind Conditions No/Headwind/Tailwind:
Altitude change 0/+m/-m: round trip from 770meters to 300 and back
Road conditions Wet/Dry: almost dry
City/Highway: Local roads with limits fro 50 to 90 km/h
Average Speed (km/h Miles/h): 43 km/h (average of the two days) see details below
Average consumption (kWh/100km kWh/mile): 19,4 kWh/100 km (average of the two days) see details below
Predicted Range at 100%: not checked
Real Range at 100%: N.A.

Details:

 

[PanameraFrank]

@Diego That's not bad at all, actually quite nice! That would be 489 km or 303 miles, on 21s, including startup and some loss for weather and with some limited regen for the new car.

 

[Diego]

@PanameraFrank Thanks Frank, yes I'm quite satisfied at the moment but I have to do some usual road that I know well and I usually did with my Tesla before making an evaluation. I know that the car will consume more but I also know that it's a completely different car (aerodynamic is great but it's an SUV and it weight something like 500 kg. more than a Tesla M3)