GaryV
Member
- First Name
- Gary
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2024
- Threads
- 2
- Messages
- 13
- Reaction score
- 4
- Location
- Boston, MA
- Vehicles
- 2024 Macan Turbo EV , 2018 911 Carrera Cabriolet
- Thread starter
- #1
I would like to use this Forum to pose a question that I honestly do not know the answer to and would really appreciate it if community members would provide their perspectives to help me form an informed opinion.
The Context - I have been the owner of 2 Macans and still own a 911. I took delivery a little more than a month ago of a Macan Turbo EV which I placed a deposit on 3 years ago so clearly I am in the camp of a Porsche enthusiast. The situation I am now experiencing is a series of "failures" displayed as random rotating warnings (photos attached). The 1st instance resolved after locking the car and returning after 15 minutes. The 2nd incident occurred a day later and I was unable to drive the car. It too resolved after the lock, wait and return methodology was used. The vehicle is now at the dealership for nearly 2 weeks and there is no indication that the source of the failures have been diagnosed, never mind corrected. Porsche AG has been involved for at least a week and I see no indication that they have any insights that will lead to a fix.
The Question - With that context and having read through many of the posts to this Forum from newly minted Macan EV owners who are experiencing a significant number of a diverse range of failure warnings with no identifiable trigger associated with them, I ask the question .... how does any individual owner or community in the case, evaluate what level of software instability is "acceptable" in a newly released vehicle or alternatively, at what point does the volume and breath of the issue give rise to the conclusion that the software platform quality is seriously flawed. Keeping in mind that while this Forum provides a great opportunity to share perspectives, ideas and recommendations, the participants represent a subset of all new Macan EV owners and therefore what we see here is not representative of the extent of the issues to the broader ownership.
My Ask - As you can imagine, I am very frustrated that for nearly 40% of my ownership period , my new $135,000 car has been unavailable to me. I suspect that many community members will have the perspective that this is to be expected in a newly released vehicle. But is that really the case or is there more at work here that may suggest deeper quality issues that extend beyond what is acceptable (I encourage reading through the variety of these types of issues that have been posted to the Forum before answering this question).
Thank you for your indulgence if you made it through this lengthy post and I look forward to your collective perspectives..
The Context - I have been the owner of 2 Macans and still own a 911. I took delivery a little more than a month ago of a Macan Turbo EV which I placed a deposit on 3 years ago so clearly I am in the camp of a Porsche enthusiast. The situation I am now experiencing is a series of "failures" displayed as random rotating warnings (photos attached). The 1st instance resolved after locking the car and returning after 15 minutes. The 2nd incident occurred a day later and I was unable to drive the car. It too resolved after the lock, wait and return methodology was used. The vehicle is now at the dealership for nearly 2 weeks and there is no indication that the source of the failures have been diagnosed, never mind corrected. Porsche AG has been involved for at least a week and I see no indication that they have any insights that will lead to a fix.
The Question - With that context and having read through many of the posts to this Forum from newly minted Macan EV owners who are experiencing a significant number of a diverse range of failure warnings with no identifiable trigger associated with them, I ask the question .... how does any individual owner or community in the case, evaluate what level of software instability is "acceptable" in a newly released vehicle or alternatively, at what point does the volume and breath of the issue give rise to the conclusion that the software platform quality is seriously flawed. Keeping in mind that while this Forum provides a great opportunity to share perspectives, ideas and recommendations, the participants represent a subset of all new Macan EV owners and therefore what we see here is not representative of the extent of the issues to the broader ownership.
My Ask - As you can imagine, I am very frustrated that for nearly 40% of my ownership period , my new $135,000 car has been unavailable to me. I suspect that many community members will have the perspective that this is to be expected in a newly released vehicle. But is that really the case or is there more at work here that may suggest deeper quality issues that extend beyond what is acceptable (I encourage reading through the variety of these types of issues that have been posted to the Forum before answering this question).
Thank you for your indulgence if you made it through this lengthy post and I look forward to your collective perspectives..